Research and publications

Revisiting the Limits of Hedge Fund Indices: a Comparative Approach

Hedge fund indices have been criticised for a lack of representativity and for their biases, to the point that serious doubts about the usefulness of hedge fund indices have been raised by investors and regulators. This paper examines whether the problems that are outlined for hedge fund indices also exist for other indices that seem to be widely accepted. The drawbacks of hedge fund indices pointed out in the literature do indeed exist. However, in this paper, the authors point out that there are possible solutions to these problems. A revisited version of this paper was published in the Spring 2008 issue of the Journal of Alternative Investments.

Author(s):

Noël Amenc, Felix Goltz

Summary:

Hedge fund indices have been criticised for a lack of representativity and for their biases, to the point that serious doubts about the usefulness of hedge fund indices have been raised by investors and regulators. This paper examines whether the problems that are outlined for hedge fund indices also exist for other indices that seem to be widely accepted. The drawbacks of hedge fund indices pointed out in the literature do indeed exist. However, in this paper, the authors point out that there are possible solutions to these problems. A revisited version of this paper was published in the Spring 2008 issue of the Journal of Alternative Investments.

Register to download PDF

Register/Log in
Type : Working paper
Date : 18/07/2007
Keywords :

Alternative Investments